Here’s the complex world that we live in trying to shed a few pounds and how understanding ‘metabolic damage’ can help.
Posted on by bwfitness91
There’s a lot of discussion in the fitness industry about whether crash dieting can cause metabolic damage. In this article, we’ll take on this interesting topic and separate fact from fiction. We’ll also teach you exactly why crash diets might be linked to struggling to maintain your weight in the future.
Despite working out consistently and intensely, plus eating carefully, you’re not losing weight (or not losing it as fast as you’d like or expect).
Or you were losing weight consistently… until recently. Now you’re stuck — even though you’re working as hard as ever.
Or when you were younger, you were super fit. Maybe you did fitness competitions. Maybe you did some crash diets. But now, even when you put in the same effort, you just can’t seem to get as lean.
“Is my metabolism damaged?”
I often get questions on my Instagram page @bradw91 (shameless plug) that are targeted towards metabolism, and believe it or not many people believe that their metabolism is slow.
And often is the case that these people put it down to an under active thyroid that they can’t do nothing about. I would challenge that view. Many of us who have been on a diet at some point could have impaired our thyroid without even realizing because it’s quite sensitive.
The Thyroid produces hormones that help control your metabolism (how fast chemical reactions occur in the body and thus the higher your metabolism the more calories you use during day-to-day life). If you have been consistently consuming a net deficit of this over a period of time your body will regulate itself and produce less hormones in order to make sure you’re not burning too much energy or too little.
These changes happen quicker the bigger the deficit so it seems common sense then that if we crash diet, we crash our metabolism. The issue with this is that when we come off the diet our metabolism is so low, that we pile it on super quick, sound familiar?! As this is the time it takes for your body to recognize that food is no longer scarce and can up its metabolism. So I don’t want to sound like your parents but moderation is the key, only cut up to 500k calories from your metabolism to try to maintain your metabolism and hold on to your muscle mass. Yes ladies even you have this.
If you crash diet for a long period of time, your Thyroid being a sensitive fellow may struggle to return to normal levels and that’s when you have to see the doctor and be prescribed levothyroxine.
But you can be saved, reverse dieting can help you minimise your fat gain and improve your metabolism and often when I’ve advised people on fat loss, it’s been the case where I’ve had to increase their calories and increase their fat levels before we can actually get to work on making a lean mean fat burning machine!
I hope that makes sense and here are some of the factors that make this whole process extremely complicated. Please comment if you feel that I’ve missed anything out or if you have any questions!
Can months or years of dieting do long-term harm to how the human body processes food?
But gaining and losing fat can change the way your brain regulates your body weight.
To understand this answer let’s explore how human metabolism actually works. Then we’ll talk about whether the metabolism can actually be damaged.
Note: This post delves into the science of energy balance, thermodynamics, and metabolic regulation. If you love learning this stuff, feel free to really dig.
Energy balance: The laws of physics still apply.
You need a certain amount of energy (in the form of calories) to stay alive, as well as to move around. You can get this energy from food, or you can retrieve it from stored energy (e.g. your fat tissue).
- If you eat less energy than you expend, you should lose weight.
- If you do the opposite (i.e. eat more energy than you expend), you should gain weight.
*We use the term “body stores” deliberately as it represents the tissues available for breakdown (fat, muscle, organ, bone, etc) and excludes water (which can change body weight independently of energy balance) and distort your scales!
This relationship between ‘energy in’ and ‘energy out’ is called the Energy Balance Equation, and it’s the most commonly accepted model for calculating a person’s energy balance and how much weight they’ll lose or gain over time.
While the Energy Balance Equation determines body weight, it doesn’t tell us much about body composition, which is influenced by things like sex hormone levels, macronutrient intake (especially protein), exercise style / frequency / intensity, age, medication use, genetic predisposition, and more.
Understandably, people get really frustrated and confused with the Energy Balance Equation when the numbers don’t seem to add up, or their results don’t match their expectations.
And it’s a fair frustration. Most of the time, the numbers don’t add up.
This mismatch between expectations versus reality is not because the Energy Balance Equation is wrong, or a myth.Nobody’s body defies the laws of physics, even though it seems like that sometimes.
It’s because the equation is more complicated than it sounds.
Many factors affect the Energy Balance Equation; they aren’t mutually exclusive. What you do to ‘energy in’ affects what happens to ‘energy out’. And vice versa.
“Eat less, move more” is a good start. (Most of us could probably benefit from eating a little less and getting a little more daily activity.)
But that advice alone isn’t enough. It doesn’t take all the complex, intersecting factors into account.
Let’s take a look at some of these factors, starting with the ‘energy in’ part of the equation.
‘Energy in’ is trickier than you think.
Reason 1: The number of calories in a meal likely doesn’t match the number of calories on the labels or menu.
This might sound hard to believe, but it’s true… the way companies (and even the government) come up with calorie and nutrient estimates is incredibly complex, rather imprecise, and centuries-old. As a result food labels are often inaccurate but that doesn’t mean don’t use them to track your macro nutrients and calorie intake. What I’d advise is to use less processed foods and weigh them! That way you will know exactly what you’re consuming.
And even if those food labels were correct:
Reason 2: The amount of energy a food contains in the form of calories is not necessarily the amount of energy we absorb, store, and/or use.
Remember that the food we eat has to be digested and processed by our unique bodies. The innumerable steps involved in digestion, processing, absorption, storage, and use — as well as our own personal physiological makeup — can all change the energy balance game.
So, for instance:
- We absorb less energy from minimally processed carbohydrates, and fats, because they’re harder to digest.
- We absorb more energy from highly processed carbohydrates and fats, because they’re easier to digest. (Think of it this way: The more “processed” a food is, the more digestion work is already done for you.)
- We often absorb more energy from foods that are cooked, chopped soaked and blended) because those processes break down plant and animal cells, increasing their bioavailability – therefore chew your food!!
When eating raw starchy foods (like sweet potatoes), we absorb very few of the calories. After cooking, however, the starches are much more available to us, tripling the number of calories absorbed.
Interestingly, allowing starchy foods to then cool before eating them decreases the amount of calories we can extract from them again.
- We may absorb more or less energy depending on the types of bacteria in our gut.
Some people have larger populations of a Bacteria, which means they are better at extracting nutrients. This is just simply your genetic makeup but as always theirs a trusty supplement that can help boost your levels of friendly bacteria! And to give you an idea, these are often measured in the billions!
In the end, by eating a diet rich in whole, minimally processed foods, the number of calories you absorb can be significanly less than what you expect. Plus they require more calories to digest.
Conversely, you will absorb more calories by eating lots of highly processed foods, plus burn fewer calories in the digestive process. (In addition, highly processed foods are less filling, more energy dense, and more likely to cause overeating.)
As you can see, there’s a big margin of error for energy input, even if you’re a conscientious calorie counter. This doesn’t invalidate the Energy Balance Equation. It just means that if you want an accurate calculation, you probably have to live in a fancy metabolic lab.
‘Energy out’ varies a lot from person to person.
‘Energy out’ — again, energy burned through daily metabolism and moving you around – is a dynamic, always-changing variable.
There are four key parts to this complex system:
1. Resting metabolic rate (RMR)
RMR is the number of calories you burn each day at rest, just to breathe, think, and live. This represents roughly 60 percent of your ‘energy out’ and depends on weight, body composition, sex, age, genetic predisposition, and possibly (again) the bacterial population of your gut.
A bigger body, in general, has a higher RMR.
- A 150-pound man might have an RMR of 1583 calories a day.
- A 200-pound man might have an RMR of 1905 calories.
- A 250-pound man might have an RMR of 2164 calories.
Crucially, RMR varies from person to person. If you’re that 200-pound guy with an RMR of 1905 calories, another guy just like you on the next treadmill might burn 286 more (or fewer) calories each day with no more (or less) effort. Many factors affect this such as muscle mass etc.
2. Thermic effect of eating (TEE)
This may surprise you, but it takes energy to digest food. Digestion is an active metabolic process. (Ever had the “meat sweats” or felt hot after a big meal, especially one with lots of protein? That’s TEE.)
TEE is the number of calories you burn by eating, digesting, and processing your food. This represents roughly 5-10 percent of your ‘energy out’.
In general, you’ll burn more calories in your effort to digest and absorb protein (20-30 percent of its calories) and carbs (5-6 percent) than you do fats (3 percent).
And as noted before, you’ll burn more calories digesting minimally processed whole foods compared to highly processed foods.
3. Physical activity (PA)
PA is the calories you burn from purposeful exercise, such as walking, running, going to the gym, gardening, riding a bike, etc.
Obviously, how much energy you expend through PA will change depending on how much you intentionally move around.
4. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT)
NEAT is the calories you burn through fidgeting, staying upright, and all other physical activities except purposeful exercise. This, too, varies from person to person and day-to-day.
Each of these is highly variable. Which means the ‘energy out’ side of the equation may be just as hard to pin down as the “energy in” side.
So, while the Energy Balance Equation sounds simple in principle, all these variables make it hard to know or control exactly how much energy you’re taking in, absorbing, burning, and storing.
When you try to outsmart your body and it outsmarts you back.
Even if all the variables in the final equation above were static, the Energy Balance Equation would be complicated enough. But things get crazy when you consider that altering any one of the variables causes adjustments in other, seemingly unrelated variables.
This is a good thing, of course. Our human metabolisms evolved to keep us alive and functioning when food was scarce. One consequence:
When ‘energy in’ goes down, ‘energy out’ goes down to match it. This means that you burn fewer calories in response to eating less.
Not in everybody. And not perfectly. But that’s how the system is supposed to work. That’s how our bodies avoid unwanted weight loss and starvation. The body fights to maintain homeostasis.
Likewise, when ‘energy in’ goes up, ‘energy out’ tends to go up too. (You burn more calories in response to eating more).
To illustrate this point, here’s how your body tries to keep your weight steady when you take in less energy and start to lose weight*.
- Thermic effect of eating goes down because you’re eating less.
- Resting metabolic rate goes down because you weigh less.
- Calories burned through Physical activity go down since you weigh less.
- Non-exercise activity thermogenesis goes down as you eat less.
- Calories not absorbed goes down and you absorb more of what you eat. ( which is why as a bodybuilder you should stay lean!! To maximize your bodies uptake of nutrients!!)
This response is particularly modest at first. But the adaptation really ramps up as you lose more weight. In addition to these tangible effects on the equation, reducing real calories eaten also causes hunger signals to increase, causing us to crave (and maybe eat) more.
The net effect leads to a much lower rate of weight loss than you might expect. In some cases, it could even lead to weight re-gain.
To add insult to injury, a rise in cortisol from the stress of dieting can cause our bodies to retain more water, making us feel “softer” and “less lean” than we actually are and affect our scales!
Interestingly, this is just one example of the amazing and robust response to trying to manipulate one variable (in this case, real calories eaten). There are similar responses when trying to manipulate the other variables in the equation.
For example, research suggests that increasing Physical activity above a certain threshold (by exercising more) can trigger:
- Increased appetite and more actual calories eaten
- Increased calories absorbed
- Decreased RMR
- Decreased NEAT
In the end, these are just two of the many examples I could use. The point is that metabolism is much more complicated (and interdependent) than most people think.
Understanding energy balance means setting better expectations about body change.
It’s important to note that if you have lots of body fat to lose, many of these adaptations (i.e. lowered RMR, PA, NEAT, etc) don’t happen right away. But, as you become leaner, this “adaptive thermogenesis” kicks in.
It’s also important to know that how your metabolism reacts to changes in energy balance will be unique to you.
How much you can lose or gain will depend on your age, your genetic makeup, your biological sex, if you’ve had relatively more or less body fat and for how long, what medications you’re taking etc.
But let’s try to simulate how this could work.
Let’s start with a 40-year-old male, with a starting weight of 235 lbs and a height of 5’10”. We’ll call him Frank.
Frank works a desk job, and is only lightly active outside of work. Using online calculators we estimate that he needs 2,976 calories of energy per day to maintain his current weight (cos he’s a fatty, damn wish I could eat this and maintain).
By knocking off 500 calories per day, his intake drops to 2,476 calories daily. And he doesn’t plan on changing his physical activity.
Now, you’ve probably heard somewhere that a pound is equivalent to 3,500 calories, which means that if we take away those 500 calories from Frank every day, he should lose 1 pound per week (500 x 7 days = 3500 calories).
He should end up at 183 lbs after one year of consistently eating 500 fewer calories every day. (According to this math, then, he would weigh 0 lbs within 5 years, which should raise some red flags.)
But we know it doesn’t exactly work this way in real life.
At the end of a year, Frank gets on the scale. He’s 205 lbs.
What the hell?
That’s 22 pounds more than I should be!
Frank rages to his wife Maria, who smiles knowingly. She’s 40 too, and has been trying to lose weight since having two kids in her mid-30s.
Tell me about it, she says. I’ve lost and gained the same 10 pounds over and over, even though I’ve been exercising and eating pretty healthy.
Then they both think:
Maybe I should try that juice cleanse after all. My body is obviously broken.
Nope, nobody is broken. Don’t hit that juice cleanse just yet.
Instead, Frank and Maria could both benefit from a clear understanding of how weight loss actually works. Then they can set appropriate behavior goals, and have realistic expectations for their progress.
So, does dieting damage the metabolism?
Despite what you may have heard:
Losing weight won’t “damage” your metabolism.
But because of the adaptations your body undergoes in response to fat loss (to prevent that fat loss, in fact), ‘energy out’ for those who have lost significant weight will always be lower than for people who were always lean.
Unfortunately, because of this adaptive response, someone who has dieted down will often require fewer calories per day to maintain the weight and physical activity level than someone who has always been that weight.
(Or even less, potentially, because as we learned in the very beginning, the RMR of people of the exact same age/weight/etc. can still vary)
This means someone who was never overweight might need 2,500 calories to maintain their weight, while someone who had to diet down to that weight may need only 2,125 – 2,375 calories to hold steady.
This is extra relevant for people who have repeatedly dieted, or for fitness competitors who may repeatedly fluctuate between being extremely lean and being overweight in the off-season.
All of this explains why some people can feel like they’ve “damaged” their metabolism through repeated dieting. (And why some experts suggest “metabolic damage” is a real thing.)
But nothing really has been “damaged”.
Instead, their bodies have become predictably more sensitive to various hormones. Their metabolic rates are understandably lower than predicted by various laboratory equations.
So, where does this leave us?
Body change is going to be harder for some people, and easier for others.
That can mean all physiological changes: weight loss or gain, fat loss or gain, and muscle loss or gain.
But even if your body might resist weight loss, you can still lose weight, gain muscle, and dramatically change your body.
Some tips on what to do next:
The physiology of weight loss is complicated, but the best strategies for losing fat and keeping it off don’t have to be.
1. Eat plenty of protein.
Protein is essential when losing weight / fat for a few reasons.
- Protein helps you keep that your lean body mass. This includes connective tissues, organs, and bone as well as muscle.
- Protein significantly increases satiety, which means you feel fuller despite eating less. (And eating more protein often causes people to eat less overall.)
- Just by eating more protein you burn more calories, because of the increased thermic effect of eating.
For example, if you’re eating 2,500 calories daily, 15 percent from protein, 50 percent from carbs, and 35 percent from fats, you’re burning approximately 185 calories per day through digestion.
Maintain your total calorie intake but increase protein to 30 percent, drop carbs to 40 percent, and whittle fat to 30 percent, and your TEE goes up to roughly 265 calories per day.
2. Eat a variety of fruits, vegetables, quality carbs, and healthy fats.
Vegetables are loaded with vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients, water, and fiber to help you fill up during meals, stay full between meals, keep you healthy, and recover from your workouts.
The carbs will fuel training, boost leptin (a super important hormone), keep up sex hormones (hurray), and prevent feelings of deprivation.
And the fats also keep up sex hormones, boost the immune system, suppress excess inflammation, and make food taste really good.
3. Adjust your intake as you plateau, or to prevent plateaus.
As your weight loss progresses, you will need to lower your calorie intake further to continue to lose weight. Your smaller body will burn fewer calories, and your body begins to adapt to your diet.
Be ready, willing, and able to adjust portion amounts objectively by removing xg of carbs Then reassess and continue to adjust as needed.
Though most weight loss plateaus have less to do with metabolic adaptations and more to do with not actually sticking to a nutrition plan consistently.
Research shows that we usually think we’re eating less and exercising more than we truly are. So do an objective review of your actual energy in and out before assuming your body is blocking your efforts.
4. Understand that this is complex.
So many things influence what, why, and when we choose to eat.
Too often, eating and body size / fatness are blamed on lack of knowledge, lack of willpower/discipline, or laziness.
Create an environment that encourages good food choices and discourages poor ones. This can mean making changes to your daily routine, who you spend time with, where you spend time, and what food is readily available to you.
But remember that weight loss can and should be relatively slow. Aim to lose a maximum of 1-2 lbs a week.
This helps to maintain muscle mass and minimize the adaptive metabolic responses to a lower calorie intake and resulting weight loss. Faster weight loss tends to result in more muscle loss without extra fat loss, as well as a larger adaptive response.
5. Cycle calories and carbs.*
For folks who are trying to get quite lean, at some point you can’t just rely on dieting. By cycling calories and carbs you can help to limit how much the metabolism-regulating hormone leptin drops (or temporarily boost it back up) – attenuating the adaptive and hunger response.
This is a higher-level strategy for fitness competitors and elite athletes who need to get very lean.
6. Refeed periodically
When getting to extreme levels of leanness, even strategic calorie and carb cycling might not be enough. Schedule a cheat meal to temporarily boost leptin and insulin and keep fat loss going.
7. Do a mixture of resistance, cardiovascular, and recovery activity.
Resistance training helps you maintain vital muscle mass, burn calories, and improve glucose tolerance. Cardiovascular exercise improves the health of your cardiovascular system, helps you expend energy, and can improve recovery.
But don’t overdo either one.
Recovery work (e.g. foam rolling, walking, yoga) helps you maintain consistency and intensity with resistance and cardio training, making them more effective. And it helps to decrease stress (lowering cortisol), which also helps you lose body fat and keep it off.
Aim for 3-5 hours per week of purposeful activity.
8. Find ways to increase NEAT.
Get a stand-up or treadmill desk, pace when on the phone, take the stairs, park further away from where you’re going, etc. These small increases in activity can make a big difference, and can account for hundreds of daily calories.
9. Have some self-compassion.
There are going to days when you don’t eat as well as you “should” don’t worry It’s OK. It happens to everyone. Recognize it, accept it, forgive yourself, and then get back on track.
Research shows that self-compassion and flexible eating is associated with lower BMI and a healthier body weight, lower self-reported calorie intake, less anxiety and stress, and a better relationship with food.
Understand what is required to reach different levels of body composition. Consider the impact that will have on your life, and choose accordingly. Is that beach body worth it?! Or will something in between that and jabba the hut do?
We hope you enjoyed this reblog. Please visit BWFitness for this article – BWFitness: Can eating too little actually damage your metabolism and limit your long term weightloss?
Thank you for visiting with us today. We hope you found this article by bwfitness91 interesting and informative. You may also enjoy these articles: How to Speed Up Your Metabolism and Minding Your Metabolism. Wishing you the Best of Health!